- European galleries are reducing their carbon emissions by recycling exhibition sets, extending the duration of exhibitions and reducing loans of works of art abroad.
- Prioritizing works from permanent collections and pieces located in neighboring countries can reduce the use of freight transport, one of the main sources of carbon emissions from exhibitions.
- These measures also help museums reduce costs.
When the coronavirus forced some of France’s busiest museums to close in 2020, it was a rare opportunity for reflection.
Conversations among curators during the lockdowns have centered around the question, “What world do we want to live in after the pandemic?” said Julie Narbey, director of the Center Pompidou in Paris, which houses the world’s largest collection of modern art. from Europe.
Narbey said his team had concluded through video calls that the pandemic was the “time to shift gears on the environment.”
“It’s in our DNA to address the big questions of the modern world,” she told the Thomson Reuters Foundation.
This has prompted a rethink of how to reduce the carbon footprint of exhibitions – from recycling staging and extending the duration of major shows to reducing the loaning of artworks abroad.
Such measures appear to be a win-win solution for museums, as they not only reduce emissions, but can also reduce costs.
It’s crucial for a part of the economy hit hard by coronavirus restrictions, according to the International Council of Museums. It can also help museums avoid mounting criticism for accept sponsorship exhibitions of fossil fuel companies.
The art world lags behind other industries in reducing greenhouse gas emissions, said Sarah Sutton, head of Environment and Culture Partners, a US nonprofit that advises cultural organizations on sustainability.
“Thankfully the industry is finally acknowledging that it’s late for the party, which means we’re finally seeing great interest in these changes,” she said.
Several initiatives have been launched in recent years – in Europe and the United States – ranging from carbon calculators to consultations and audits of galleries’ efforts to become greener.
“For me, the question is not how long it will take, but how fast can we accelerate it,” Sutton said.
While she said she was “extremely optimistic”, she stressed that more needs to be done to educate funders and donors about the work of art museums so that they become more sustainable.
Museums’ climate impacts have long been assumed to be too small to justify change, or artistic directors are equating climate with politics and fear it will hurt funding, she said.
Home is where the art is
Paris is home to three of the most visited art museums in the world: the Louvre, the Musée d’Orsay and the Center Pompidou.
In a normal year, they welcome millions of visitors, mostly from overseas, resulting in a substantial carbon footprint.
While museums can’t do much to cut tourist air travel, they can cut the flights of a Warhol or a Picasso, said Guergana Guintcheva, a marketing professor at EDHEC Lille who conducted research on museums.
One of the main sources of exhibitions’ carbon emissions come from transporting artwork from collections around the world, according to the Galleries Climate Coalition (GCC), a global charity providing sustainable guidelines for the art sector.
“For every work of art, there is a round trip by air – and at least two round trips for a curator,” Guintcheva said.
She cited the Palais des Beaux Arts in Lille as taking a climate-conscious approach with its recent Goya exhibition.
By favoring works from its permanent collection and pieces located in neighboring European countries, the museum reduced freight transport for the art it displayed.
The Center Pompidou also focuses on sourcing local artwork rather than loans from the United States or Asia.
Some museums are also greening exhibitions by pooling resources.
Center Pompidou’s Narbey said shipping requests can be shared with the Louvre or Musée d’Orsay for transport from the same locations, such as New York, reducing both emissions and costs.
The GCC last month launched its “Sustainable Shipping Campaign” – calling for a global reduction in air freight by 2028 and local low- or zero-emission deliveries by 2025.
Our planet is straining under the weight of a world population of almost 8 billion people.
The World Economic Forum’s Center for Nature and Climate accelerates action on climate change and environmental sustainability, food systems, circular economy and value chains, and the future of international development.
- Through the Global Plastic Action Partnership, we bring together government, business and civil society to shape a more sustainable world through the eradication of plastic pollution.
- The center champions nature-based solutions. Global companies work together across the 1t.org initiative to support 1 trillion trees by 2030. As of September 2021, over 30 companies have pledged to conserve, restore and grow over 3.6 billion trees in over 60 countries.
- Through a partnership with US Presidential Special Envoy for Climate John Kerry and more than 30 global companies, the Forum encourages companies to join the Early Mover Coalition and invest in innovative green technologies so they are available for a massive scale-up by 2030 to enable net-zero emissions by 2050 at the latest.
- The center also brings together leaders to engage in a circular economy approach. Globally, the Scale360° initiative will reduce the environmental impact of value chains in the fashion, food, plastics and electronics industries – an important step in making the opportunity for 4.5 trillion dollar circular economy a reality. The African Circular Economy Alliance funds circular economy entrepreneurs and activities in countries like Rwanda, Nigeria and South Africa. In China, the Forum’s Circular Electronics in China project is helping companies reduce and recycle 50% of e-waste by 2025.
- The Forum also offers crowdsourcing solutions to the climate crisis through its open innovation platform, UpLink. Since 2020, this digital space has hosted more than 40,000 users working on more than 30 challenges, including reducing ocean plastic pollution, stepping up efforts to conserve, restore and grow 1 trillion trees, and innovating in the production and processing of aquatic foods.
Contact us for more information on how to get involved.
less is more
Curators are used to creating blockbusters of 150-200 works, but sustainability advocates say these could be scaled back.
Staging a show requires a large amount of carbon-intensive materials, which are often thrown away at the end of the run. More and more museums are now looking to recycle wherever possible.
At the Center Pompidou, parts of the staging of the 2020 exhibition “Christo and Jeanne-Claude” were reused in last year’s Hito Steyerl exhibition at the artist’s request.
“She looked up to Christo and she was interested in following in their footsteps, but she also wanted, like us, to have a smaller carbon footprint,” Narbey said.
In Lille, the Palais des Beaux-Arts presents a new exhibition, “The Enchanted Forest”, which takes up 70% of the scenography and staging of the Goya exhibition.
One of the ways the museum achieved this was to reuse a “rotunda” room in the lobby that was designed to be multipurpose.
Slowing down is also part of the green philosophy of some French museums. Extending the duration of large exhibitions instead of having a high trade show turnover rate can reduce carbon emissions.
It can also prove popular with Center Pompidou visitors who sometimes complain when shows last only three months, Narbey said.
Yet the public seems largely unaware of museums’ efforts to reduce emissions, Guintcheva said, noting that many people paid little heed to the Goya exhibit’s sustainability advisories.
Sutton from Environment and Culture Partners said tackling climate change was still not a key selling point for many members of the public.
“I see it as a matter of credibility more than attracting visitors, and credibility matters to funders, policy makers and community members,” said Sutton, who previously held various museum roles. and taught university modules.
“Museums and galleries are public benefit organisations. This obliges them to do no harm,” she added.
“‘Do no harm’ is a definitive, not a comparable.”